Wireless Carriers - Black-Eye - Early Termination Fees

There is always quite a bit of talk around aboutThat means wireless networks should not charge
how unfair it is that wireless networks chargeearly termination fees to customers if they are
early termination fees or ETF. People ask, whatnot giving customers a discount in return.
gives the networks the right to charge theseAdditionally, flat-rate early termination fees that
fees. Are they trying to get the customer upset?companies charged in the past are not right. They
Don't they realize that upset customers won't doshould decrease the further we go into the
business with them again?contract. If the customer leaves near the end the
All the arguments sound good, but are wrong,carrier loses much less than if they left early on.
mostly. The point behind these fees is beingSo the customer ETF should be much less.
missed. They were not originally set up as a profitGenerally speaking early termination fees are fair.
center. This was simply set up to make sure theHowever companies began to wield them like a
company didn't lose money, then it changed oversword and abuse the customer. That is when the
time.customer started to turn on the whole idea.
In the US phones are sold on a different basisGenerally speaking most wireless carriers have, or
than other countries. Elsewhere customers pay fullare, reworking this charge and moving from a flat
price per phone. That means they pay hundredsrate to a pro-rated amount. This is fair. However
of dollars more per phone. In the US thesethis is for new contracts. Existing contracts are
phones are discounted by hundreds of dollars.still on the old basis.
Customers like this lower initial price.So this is a problem that will take care of itself
The network discounts the price and pays theover the next year or two as older contracts
additional amount themselves. As long as theexpire.
customer stays for the length of the contract,The FCC has also asked all four of the major
typically two years, then the network recoverswireless providers, Verizon Wireless, AT&T
this large discount and makes a profit.Mobility, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile USA and even
That's the key part that the customer forgets. IfGoogle for that matter, to explain their early
the customer cancels in less than the length oftermination fee policies. They also want to know
the contract the carrier loses money.how these carriers disclose this information to
There are only two prices carriers can charge;their customers. Perhaps some tweaking will be
the non-discounted price, and the discounted price.helpful.
People think the price they pay, the discountedThere are many other wireless carriers, like Apple
price, is the only price. They think it is a marketingand Dell and all the smaller players as well. Perhaps
gimmick to have a non-discounted price.they will be asked the same questions at some
Customers think this is supposed to let them thinkpoint.
they got a better deal and that no one actuallyIn the beginning this fee was not a profit center.
pays the full amount.However over time this may have changed and
This is where the cell phone industry is missingbecome one. If the carriers focus on protecting
the boat. They should explain that in manythemselves from loss and not on profit, I think
countries customers do pay the full price. Theycustomers would understand and both sides could
should also give the customer the choice up front.live in peace.
Let the customer choose the basis to doThe pendulum swung one way in the beginning,
business. That will clear up the problem.then it swung to the unfair side, now it is time for
Tell the customer they have a choice. They canthe pendulum to swing back to the middle where
either pay the full price and have no earlyit is fair for both the customer and the cellular
termination fees, or take the discounted price, butnetworks, and it looks like that is what is
have to abide by the two-year contract with thehappening now.
carrier.